Comments on: Packaged staging and what it gives http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/ Embedded Linux development Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:33:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Marcin Juszkiewiczhttp://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/#comment-10261 Marcin Juszkiewicz Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:25:27 +0000 http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/?p=470#comment-10261 <p><strong>@yans:</strong> rebuild of package is done from sources.</p><p>SSL for comments is now disabled - thanks for reporting this.</p> @yans: rebuild of package is done from sources.

SSL for comments is now disabled – thanks for reporting this.

]]> By: yanshttp://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/#comment-10257 yans Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:21:27 +0000 http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/?p=470#comment-10257 <p>How about package modifications ? Let's say I modified a "pname" recipe that has already been built. Is it going to be rebuild when I ask for it (bitbake -f -c clear pname; bitbake pname ) or regenerated from pstage with no modifications ?</p><p>PS. Why does posing comments involve ssl ? A bonus for ssl at your site is a firefox error "ssl_error_bad_cert_domain" - cert was generated for *.kei.pl and not for .biz ... Or I am wrong - and some one is really sniffing my posts :P</p> How about package modifications ? Let’s say I modified a “pname” recipe that has already been built. Is it going to be rebuild when I ask for it (bitbake -f -c clear pname; bitbake pname ) or regenerated from pstage with no modifications ?

PS. Why does posing comments involve ssl ? A bonus for ssl at your site is a firefox error “ssl_error_bad_cert_domain” – cert was generated for *.kei.pl and not for .biz … Or I am wrong – and some one is really sniffing my posts :P

]]> By: yanshttp://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/#comment-10256 yans Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:17:46 +0000 http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/?p=470#comment-10256 <p>How about package modifications ? Let's say I modified a "pname" recipe that has already been built. Is it going to be rebuild when I ask for it (bitbake -f -c clear pname; bitbake pname ) or regenerated from pstage with no modifications ?</p> How about package modifications ? Let’s say I modified a “pname” recipe that has already been built. Is it going to be rebuild when I ask for it (bitbake -f -c clear pname; bitbake pname ) or regenerated from pstage with no modifications ?

]]> By: Marcin Juszkiewiczhttp://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/#comment-10255 Marcin Juszkiewicz Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:07:47 +0000 http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/?p=470#comment-10255 <p><strong>@Koen:</strong> my home machine is building each Poky recipe from scratch now. Tomorrow I will work on adding missing dependencies.</p> @Koen: my home machine is building each Poky recipe from scratch now. Tomorrow I will work on adding missing dependencies.

]]> By: koenhttp://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/2008/07/01/packaged-staging-and-what-it-gives/#comment-10254 koen Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:21:22 +0000 http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/?p=470#comment-10254 <p>Angstrom has enabled packaged-staging by default for some months now. It is a real timesaver when trying to track down dependency problems.</p> Angstrom has enabled packaged-staging by default for some months now. It is a real timesaver when trying to track down dependency problems.

]]>